What? Since when does Valve prohibit companies from redirecting customers to non-Valve purchasing flows? Because that’s what this ruling is about, it says Apple can’t prohibit apps from telling users to go buy off-platform for lower prices. Valve isn’t doing that with Steam afaik, actually I not aware of any other platform that does this
Every store does this. Even Holy Valve
hikaru755@lemmy.world 6 days ago
JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Valve will even allow developers to create their own Steam keys free of charge and sell them wherever they want with no commission whatsoever
That’s pretty open I’d say
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 days ago
Lol, as long as you properly plan in advance and coordinate such a thing, not the way that uh… Dead Matter tried to do it.
Dear god what a fustercluck.
kbotc@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Any of the video game companies.
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 days ago
They literally do not lol
Serinus@lemmy.world 6 days ago
Here comes the Steam defenders.
ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 4 days ago
I have many issues with the game deference to the steam monopoly… But they don’t partake in this particular abuse: taking a cut from the dev for all in game purchases. They only take a (sizeable) cut for the initial game purchase.
lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 days ago
Every company who takes a cut from in-app purchases, be it subscriptions or DLC, should be kneecapped by this ruling.
It’s one thing to take a cut from purchasing a game/app/whatever from whatever market it’s hosted on, it’s a whole other issue to keep reaching further into the dev’s pockets and take a cut from in-app purchases unrelated to the initial marketplace where the game/app was obtained.
Greercase@lemmus.org 6 days ago
That just turns paid apps into splash screens for in-app purchases though. That way apple never gets a cut because the “purchase” is in-app. Pay to be listed (maybe tiered depending on downloads) seems fair especially because it doesn’t incentivize people to do scammy things with pricing. It’s already a fee anyway.
lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 days ago
Welcome to Android lol
Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 days ago
“This app is Free!”
*opens app*
“Psyche! Get your credit card out…”
lepinkainen@lemmy.world 6 days ago
I’m not entirely optimistic about this ruling, but we’ll see.
Apple had no reason NOT to give refunds and then use their weight to claw it back from the app developer.
But what happens when scammy apps use non-AppStore scammy stores to unlock features in an app?
In a perfect world it’s cheap and easy and reliable.
But it can also be a scammy shop that lures you into expensive subscriptions with no easy way to cancel them (eg. gym membership) and what happens when Little Timmy spends $9000 for Nlartbux in a mobile game’s external store?
Could go either way 🤷🏻♂️
lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 days ago
Greed.
We already have that on Android. We manage just fine.
Could be. Again, sideloading on Android is a thing already. Multiple alternative markets exist, and some shops are scammy as fuck. Google has already put protections in place to prevent sideloading potentially harmful apps, but the savvy user who knows how to bypass that should* know how to spot a harmful app.
“For your security” was never about security.
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 6 days ago
That’s why you don’t put your credit card info in a phone or tablet and let kids play with it.
lepinkainen@lemmy.world 6 days ago
And still people do it, they even give their own devices to kids with CC info pre-filled and no safeties on purchases.
Imagine how bad it is when the next fake ad game gets Timmy to subscribe to a $99/day gem pack…