Comment on Why I don't use AI in 2025
drspod@lemmy.ml 1 week agoIt was pretty obvious the approach behind for instance Deep Blue wasn’t the way forward.
That’s a weird example to pick. What exactly about Deep Blue do you think wasn’t the way forward?
Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Deep blue was mostly based on raw computational power, with very little ability to actually judge whether a draw was “good” without calculating the possibilities following it.
As I understand it, it only worked on Chess as a “mathematical” problem, and was incapable of judging strategic positions, except if it had “seen” it before, and already calculated the likely outcomes.
In short, there was very little intelligence, it was based only on memory and massive calculation power. Which indeed are aspects of intelligence, but only on a very low level.