Given your prompts, maybe you are good at discerning flaws and analysing your own arguments too
Comment on People Are Losing Loved Ones to AI-Fueled Spiritual Fantasies
Zozano@aussie.zone 5 days agoActually, given the aforementioned prompts, its quite good at discerning flaws in my arguments and logical contradictions.
Olap@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Zozano@aussie.zone 5 days ago
I’m good enough at noticing my own flaws, as not to be arrogant enough to believe I’m immune from making mistakes :p
LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 days ago
Yeah this is my experience as well.
People you’re replying to need to stop with the “gippity is bad” nonsense, it’s actually a fucking miracle of technology. You can criticize the carbon footprint of the corpos and the for-profit nature of the endeavour without shooting yourself in the foot by attacking what is very evidently not true.
In fact, if you haven’t found a use for a gippity type chatbot thing, it speaks a lot more about you and the fact you probably don’t do anything that complicated in your life where this would give you genuine value.
The article in OP also demonstrates how it could be used by the deranged/unintelligent for bad as well, so maybe it’s like a dunning-kruger curve.
Zozano@aussie.zone 5 days ago
Granted, it is flakey unless you’ve configured it not to be a shit cunt. Before I manually set these prompts and memory references, it talked shit all the time.
Satellaview@lemmy.zip 5 days ago
God that’s arrogant.
LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 days ago
I know, and that’s fair. But am I wrong? That’s what matters more than anything else.
I make a lot of bold statements on this account, but I never do so lightly or unthinkingly.