They know, read their yearly financial reports. They said for a decade that Windows is not only not profitable, there’s no future for it. Microsoft for several years now is a company that sells cloud and opensource services(Linux, Github, etc).
reddig33@lemmy.world 5 days ago
When are stockholders going to realize that the current Microsoft CEO is ruining Windows?
pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 5 days ago
freely1333@reddthat.com 5 days ago
Kinda joking because in many ways windows is better than ever… but also making windows have non starter features enhances Linux adoption soooo
spicehoarder@lemm.ee 5 days ago
Better than ever? What? Bloated than ever maybe.
freely1333@reddthat.com 4 days ago
Better than ever in base usability as an operating system for the average person. And you can run wsl2 and have a full Linux environment too. It’s as close to a macOS user friendly experience as it has ever been without losing the windows identity.
spicehoarder@lemm.ee 4 days ago
Okay, I’ll give you wsl2, and the “average user experience” being better, but Windows is losing its identity with the IT and customization front. For both destroying the win32 control panel and locking down the shell so you can no longer customize it.
Somewhat ironically OSX recently added widgets to the desktop. Something Microsoft did years ago, removed it for no reason, and then added a flyout to tick almost the same check boxes.
As for me, the spike in resource usage and over saturation of “AI” was enough for me to decide to jump ship.
I’m currently attempting to daily drive Manjaro so maybe my opinion will change, but so far, it feels like home.
OmgItBurns@discuss.online 5 days ago
I’m getting daily or near daily BSODs since switch back from Debian. I was okay with Vista and 8, and maybe I’m just getting crankier as I get older, but I definitely am not a fan of the current direction Windows is taking.
spicehoarder@lemm.ee 5 days ago
It’s valid to feel disappointed. Windows 7 was really stable.
My work still has a windows 7 machine with an uptime of something like 12 years.
Windows 7 will idle in the low megabytes. But why does 11 want to use 6-8 Gigs on idle for no good reason?
And it’s not like there’s that much difference between the two operating systems. One is just loaded up with electron wrappers and dpyware
michaelmrose@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Windows can’t be updated in any meaningful way without being rebooted because Windows can’t overwrite a file that is in use. This makes it fairly unlikely for a machine to be up for 12 years.
Windows 7 also doesn’t “idle in the low MBs” It uses almost 1G at least at startup more if you have apps that auto start and like every OS it caches recently accessed files.
toastmeister@lemmy.ca 5 days ago
It seems like a buggy mess to me.