Comment on That's all folks, Plex is starting to charge for sharing
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 week agoOk so before when you said:
The work required to expose Jellyfin to the world is the same work to expose Plex.
What you actually meant was the work required to expose Jellyfin to the world is entirely different from the work you have to do to now expose Plex without paying. And the simplest solution of forwarding a port will no longer work for free, and anyone you share it with now also has to connect their device to Tailscale (if they even can on their device) even if they’re non-technical?
Where as with Jellyfin you can remotely stream without having to do ANY of that for free…
Are you starting to understand why this might make people just switch to Jellyfin?
Revilo62@lemmy.world 1 week ago
You can still just forward a port. Just expose the web ui port to the world, the same way Jellyfin does. That’s not recommended though, it has potential security issues. The recommended way would require a reverse proxy or tailscale. Then you’re right back to the same issues no matter the service you’re using.
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 week ago
You can if you pay. I’m not sure what about this is so difficult for you to understand.
Revilo62@lemmy.world 1 week ago
You can if you don’t pay. The only thing they’re blocking is traffic through their servers. If you expose the port to your local instance, they have no control over it. I’m not sure what about this is so difficult for you to understand.
EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 week ago
No, you can’t.
Once again, this is wrong. They are blocking traffic to your server even if you don’t go through theirs, unless you pay.
You cannot do what you’re suggesting if you don’t pay.