Forcing people is one thing, not telling them its a thing is completely different. Most Windows users dont even know their Windows has bitlocker enabled and those keys are out of their sight
Rooki@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Yeah it can happen, when you force people without their consent encrypting their data.
cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de 4 weeks ago
Melonpoly@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Isn’t that what Iphone and Android already do?
Object@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
One major difference is that it is so much easier to lock yourself out of the desktop TPM chip compared to mobile device security chips because they’re not tightly coupled.
acosmichippo@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
and phones make you use your unlock pin often, so people are forced to remember it. on the other hand windows lets you use a short pin instead of your full account password pretty much forever which results in people forgetting the password completely.
Rooki@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
That isnt even the part it is encrypted, the TPM encryption is either “Automatic” or over a password (any length) on startup so far i know it from my work with Bitlocker (tpm 2.0) on windows 10. Idk if this is different on windows 11.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Huh … I never noticed. Probably because my phone OS never failed to boot, requiring me to pull data off the HDD directly.
Landless2029@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Samsung is notorious for this.
OfficerBribe@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Android I think just uses same credentials you use to unlock account, at least I am not aware of any recovery key. And you are prompted for credentials from time to time so it is harder to forget. I use fingerprint as main unlock + pattern and I have to enter pattern roughly once a week I think.
On Windows if you set up Windows Hello (fingerprint or PIN usually), you are not reminded to enter password afterwards so eventually you can forget it.
Lembot_0002@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
Most people don’t have anything of importance on their phones. And the tuning options are almost absent on phones, so it is less problematic bug-wise.
thesystemisdown@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
For many, a mobile device is their sole computer, and things of importance to them are stored on it.
user224@lemmy.sdf.org 5 weeks ago
Le banking app.
ieatpillowtags@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
No you’re right, nobody has precious photos or videos on their phone 🙄
Lembot_0002@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
If they don’t save those photos somewhere else from time to time, it means those photos aren’t that important.
pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Yeah, nothing important. Just your banking apps, personal documents, photos, government apps, emails, all the services linked to your phone via mobile number, personal chats, work chats, 2fa codes, some other not important stuff. But at least it doesn’t have your games. Unless you play games on your phone, then you are fucked.
Rooki@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
The only phone manufacture that does that is Google with pixel. Any other phone is for my knowledge either “weakly” encrypted or not at all.
Still your Mobile OS isnt just upgrading and encrypting your SD card and main drive. Thats the point.
InnerScientist@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
source.android.com/docs/security/…/file-based?hl=…
MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
Different threat model and usage scenario.