It’s bad because it uses tons of space and resources that could be used for other things. It also promotes mono culture and it usually uses fertilizers and pesticides that are not necessarily allowed on other crops, as they won’t be used as feed.
So, it’s bad for biodiversity, bad for land use, bad for resource use. The upside of being a low carbon fuel is completely offset by the impact it has on nature.
Comment on It would require about 31 hectares of corn ethanol to produce the same amount of energy generate
NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 11 months agoIs bio ethanol bad?
BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 11 months ago
SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 months ago
The thing with biofuels is that they could be used to feed people instead
randomwords@midwest.social 11 months ago
Yes, really really bad.
evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 11 months ago
From wikipedia:
Add on top of that the environmental impact and opportunity cost of the land use, and corn based ethanol becomes a non-viable solution.