It’s bad because it uses tons of space and resources that could be used for other things. It also promotes mono culture and it usually uses fertilizers and pesticides that are not necessarily allowed on other crops, as they won’t be used as feed.
So, it’s bad for biodiversity, bad for land use, bad for resource use. The upside of being a low carbon fuel is completely offset by the impact it has on nature.
Comment on It would require about 31 hectares of corn ethanol to produce the same amount of energy generate
NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 1 year agoIs bio ethanol bad?
BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 1 year ago
SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
The thing with biofuels is that they could be used to feed people instead
randomwords@midwest.social 1 year ago
Yes, really really bad.
evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 1 year ago
From wikipedia:
Add on top of that the environmental impact and opportunity cost of the land use, and corn based ethanol becomes a non-viable solution.