Those are the easy time savings though, the safe easy stuff the developer doesn’t have to worry about anymore. (Giving them time do the gnarly stuff)
Comment on Microsoft CEO says up to 30% of the company's code was written by AI | TechCrunch
SandmanXC@lemmy.world 4 days agoAlso, having 1/3 lines with obvious code that can be auto suggested correctly would make sense, but that is hardly code “written by ai” in the way they suggest.
Nighed@feddit.uk 4 days ago
taladar@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
It is exactly the opposite, with simple, predictable auto-complete you didn’t have to worry about that anymore, with LLMs you always have to look at it in detail because every little thing could be just plain completely different and wrong.
Nighed@feddit.uk 4 days ago
I can read way faster than I can type though. You still check it, but it’s pretty good as that kind of stuff once you have an example for it to follow.
taladar@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
Reading code is usually orders of magnitude slower than writing code. Sure, typing might be slower than reading but to check if it is what you intended you have to understand it too.
megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
I’d guess a lot of the people writing the code don’t even have it turned on, it’s just installed because management said it had to be, because management wants to be able to tell investors they’re “innovating work flows”.
balder1991@lemmy.world 4 days ago
I am a small sample to confirm that’s exactly it.