Comment on xkcd #3081: PhD Timeline

• OriginalUsername7@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  The only people that read xkcd are those that can understand it

  If that was true, there’d be no need for ExplainXKCD.com.

  And even then on some of the more physics-y ones I just give Randall the benefit of the doubt that it’s funny.

  source

  • Hoimo@ani.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    I think there’s a difference between being able to understand and having all the information to understand. Randall has a very wide range of topics that he makes comics on and most readers won’t know enough about every topic to get every joke, even though he does his best to simplify it for a broad audience. That’s the reason ExplainXKCD exists. But his audience is generally nerds, people who like learning new information, which is also what Explain caters to. So it is both true that his audience can (and are willing to) understand and that Explain helps them understand. (I also think that nerds love explaining stuff, so it makes sense that the main fandom website is ExplainXKCD, even if there were no demand for explanations.)

    source
  • RandomVideos@programming.dev ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    XKCD covers so many subjects, its hard to understand all of them

    source
  • four@lemmy.zip ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Sometimes even explainxkcd doesn’t help :c

    source
• brucethemoose@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  It’s fairly popular in tech circles where there’s a large intersection with MAGA, or at least a more “keep politics out of my programming” attitude predating that.

  source