Not everyone has time, skill, or desire to spend their nights learning how to build and configure a nas.
People have other hobbies than IT, so if a photographer wants to have a local storage for his portfolio without faff, I guess they can get fucked?
Really with your gatekeeping
Comment on Synology could bring “certified drive” requirements to more NAS devices
ftbd@feddit.org 11 months ago
People who buy overpriced “solutions” instead of taking the time to configure a PC seem like exactly the crowd to enjoy a closed ecosystem (see apple)
filcuk@lemmy.zip 11 months ago
ftbd@feddit.org 11 months ago
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t support this. But I can see how the suits at Synology could come to the conclusion that this is a great idea
AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 11 months ago
The reason why Synology is great is their bulletproof reliability.
Sure you might be able to make a PC perform the same spec for spec but will it actually? And even with these devices, they are so far from Apple it isn’t funny, you have to set up a fair bit still to make the most of them.
Honestly HDDs/SDDs are a disposable part of the backup ecosystem, I get that they want some extra money but there are already scripts to overcome some of the existing compability checkers in these systems.