Comment on Bluesky has started honoring takedown requests from Turkish government
Natanael@infosec.pub 3 days agoCurrently, you have stuff like Clearsky (it’s basically an archive.org for bluesky)
Comment on Bluesky has started honoring takedown requests from Turkish government
Natanael@infosec.pub 3 days agoCurrently, you have stuff like Clearsky (it’s basically an archive.org for bluesky)
huppakee@lemm.ee 3 days ago
Which is not part of Bluesky, only proving the point having a central system controlling the data makes the data vulnerable.
Natanael@infosec.pub 2 days ago
Sorry what, an example of a 3rd party service proving 3rd party mirrors exists proves it’s vulnerable to what? It’s content addressed and as open as it gets, it’s literally designed to survive if the company goes down
huppakee@lemm.ee 2 days ago
Yes, but in comparison to a federation only the information will survive because it was copied out of the central system, but the system will fail as soon as the company folds. I mean the reason the fact that you need a 3rd party mirror to save the data proves the flaws of the 1st party. This instance for example doesn’t need to be mirrored because it is built on a foundation that already has redundancy built in.
Natanael@infosec.pub 2 days ago
I’m not sure you know what content addressing is.