Comment on Python Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()

ne0n@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

• ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  That woulb be 0.5x. −2x implies negative duration, which makes no sense. Neither does the layout of anything else in the image.

  source
• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  I think it was supposed to be a ~, since they use that in the paragraph below the image.

  source

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Blame AI

    source

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      It probably is AI. Either that, or a drunken stupor that produced that graph.

      source
• Randelung@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  Maybe they mean up to?

  source