Comment on Adobe Gets Bullied Off Bluesky

• lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

  No

  Please stop with the “ablism” thing to shut down anything good but not good enough.

  What is not helpful is calling people tomstip using a normal day to day tool just because it isn’t perfectly adjusted for < 1% of the Internet users.

  Emphatic no to your no. Disabling content isn’t good or helpful. Disabled content is worse for everyone: no source, less functionality, less to corroborate, often harder to read. It’s only “good enough” for people like you while pointlessly excluding those unlike you, ie, ableism.

  we can improve upon this by, I dunno, making an image format for screenshots that allow for alt text or whatever.

  A new technology isn’t needed: not breaking what isn’t broken is enough. Better alternatives have existed since the beginning of the web: linking, embedding, or even copying & pasting the text into a blockquote. A screenshot of web content is a shitty tool serving the able-bodied.

  If I can’t see the info on bluesky without an account then yes, a screenshot should be required.

  That’s a strong argument for pressuring bluesky to cut their crap instead of enabling their structural ableism by taking screenshots. The alternatives mentioned before still exist.

  Bluesky content can be deleted

  There’s this crazy feature where if you select the text instead of a rectangle of screen, you can copy & paste it. Always been there. About the same number of steps. Wild.

  I’m not saying I don’t care about them

  Whether you “care” doesn’t matter when the effect is the same as not caring and the simplest actions anyone could take aren’t taken. The effect of that blithe, inconsiderate disregard is structural ableism. Rather than take the easy way out & reinforce this, we each have to power to address it.

  Unlike the abstract issues often discussed here far removed from our control, these are practical actions within our immediate control. We all have power with the simplest of gestures to make our content accessible instead of selfishly able-centric.

  Choosing not to when we know better indicates who we are. Defending acts to harmfully disable content also indicates who we are.

  source

  • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

    Emphatic no to your no. Disabling content isn’t good or helpful. Disabled content is worse for everyone: no source, less functionality, less to corroborate, often harder to read.

    this is disabled content. we are barred from reading it, unless we register. parent commenter asked one thing: also include a screenshot for cases like this

    this is an empathetic no to reading your comment any further

    source

    • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

      As written multiple times, there are better alternatives. Disregarding them is shortsighted ableism. I suggest working on your attention span.

      source

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨week⁩ ago

        better alternatives? linking, embeddib? worthless when the website itself decides thatbit won’t show you the content

        quoting? you mean, all of the response tweets? and how do you quote images, videos?

        source

        • -> View More Comments