Comment on Microsoft fires employee protestor who called AI boss a ‘war profiteer’
nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month agoi agree with what you’re saying from an ethical standpoint.
but it’s not “an issue”, it’s a huge fucking client of theirs. from a business standpoint its a huge ask to fire a whole military as a customer.
“We cant stop selling to war criminals. They are among our biggest customers.”
Sounds more like a company that needs to be dismantled and have their leadership face prison sentences. Given the size of Microsoft they could take the hit economically w.o. much hassle. They dont have to be evil. They want to be evil. And we need to punish them for it by boycotting their shit as much as possible.
Can’t help but think of this book wrt your comment en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Surely there’s an option between “drop major client” and “punish the person pointing out problems”
meliaesc@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Disrupting a meeting like that was always going to end in getting fired.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It didn’t have to. You only expect it to because there’s a history of companies being shitty.
Psycoder@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Not only will they fire her, they will also be less willing to hire other Palestinians in the future.
I don’t know about Microsoft but a FAANG company I worked for had very well documented means of raising ethical or legal issues within the company. She just violated her employment contract and possibly her NDA with the company by doing this.
I don’t mean to say she is right/wrong. It is just that she did not follow the guidelines of the company she works for. Therefore she will be fired even if she is right/wrong.
Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 month ago
So a choice between money and ethics.
There is never any question which one companies choose.
Certainly not the one with a carreer in scumbaggery.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 month ago
My point was that there are plenty of other options.
Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 month ago
My point is: not for them