I would agree with that if the cost of the tool was prohibitively expensive for the average person, but it’s really not.
Comment on Most Americans think AI won’t improve their lives, survey says
CosmoNova@lemmy.world 1 month ago
AI is mainly a tool for the powerful to oppress the lesser blessed. I mean cutting actual professionals out of the process to let CEOs wildest dreams go unchecked has devastating consequences already if rumors are to believed that some kids using ChatGPT cooked up those massive tariffs that have already erased trillions.
pennomi@lemmy.world 1 month ago
CosmoNova@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It‘s too expensive for society already as it has stolen work from millions to even be trained with millions more to come. We literally cannot afford to work for free when the rich already suck up all that productivity increase we‘ve gained over the last century.
pennomi@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I disagree. While intellectual property legally exists, ethically there’s no reason to be protective of it.
Information should be a shared resource for everyone, and all these open weights models are a good example of that in action.
CosmoNova@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Prepare to die on that hill I guess because this couldn‘t be further of what is happening right now. Copyright exists but only for top oligarchs.
doodledup@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Life isn’t always Occam’s Razor.
applemao@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yet my libertarian centrist friend INSISTS that AI is great for humanity. I keep telling him the billionaires don’t give a fuck about you and he keeps licking boots. How many others are like this??
FourWaveforms@lemm.ee 1 month ago
I used to be that dumb. I was about 22 at the time
applemao@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yep seems common among that age
futatorius@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Far too many: more than zero.