Did you know that Charlie Chaplain actually made a movie with audio? Watch how something that’s actually so old somehow becomes new to you…
Comment on Should a movie released in 1995 be considered an "old" movie?
remotelove@lemmy.ca 1 day agoI have been working through my “must watch” list with my teenage daughter recently. While all the movies are absolutely new to her, that hasn’t stopped the occasional snickering about how “old” some of the stuff is. (And honestly, I can’t disagree. I had a few “ah fuck I’m old” moments rewatching Predator and Blade Runner recently.)
So, in spirit, I 100% agree with you. In reality, nobody can quite escape how old some actually movies feel.
over_clox@lemmy.world 1 day ago
remotelove@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Sorry, I couldn’t quite get the feeling you described. It’s partially because I have seen that before and partially because it still looks old and the sound quality was reminiscent of a cylinder phonograph.
Good try though. ;)
over_clox@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Hah, interesting that you’ve seen that before, cool cool 👍
As crappy as the audio is, honestly it’s still pretty good for when it was made.
remotelove@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
I actually like the audio. (I’ll leverage faux tape recording effects and plate reverb on occasion with music I write.)
And honestly, it was kinda refreshing to watch Charlie Chaplain again.
jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I wanted to watch the OG Nosferatu before the new one, my wife could not stop laughing.
“No! This serious horror movie!”
(snort)
klu9@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
[OT: watch “Shadow of the Vampire” after watching the OG Nosferatu.]
jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I watched the Third Man next which was fascinating. Lots of similar shadow use.