Comment on GenAI website goes dark after explicit fakes exposed
jaschen@lemm.ee 1 week agoI don’t need to. It’s is just the way gen AI works. It takes images of things it knows and then generates NEW content based on what it think you want with your prompts.
If I’m looking for a infant flying an airplane, gen AI knows what a pilot looks like and what a child looks like and it creates something new.
Also kids face data doesn’t mean they take the actual face of the actual child and paste it on a body. It might take an eyebrow and a freckle from one kidand use a hair style from another and eyes from someone else.
Lastly, the kids parents consented when they upload images of their kids on social media.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 week ago
If you think that AI is only trained on legal images, I can’t convince you otherwise.
jaschen@lemm.ee 1 week ago
I mean, you’re not giving a very convincing argument.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 week ago
AI models are trained on the open Internet. Not curated. Open Internet has horrible things.
jaschen@lemm.ee 1 week ago
So is that the Gen AI problem or the open internets problem. It sounds like you hate the open internet and awful people who put real cp online and not Gen AI.
ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 week ago
What AI are you talking about? Are you suggesting the commercial models from OpenAI are trained using CP? Or just that there are some models out there that were trained using CP? Because yeah, anyone can create a model at home and train it with whatever. But suggesting that OpenAI has a DB of tagged CP is a different story.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Open AI just scours the Internet. 100% chance it’s come across someone illegal and horrible. They don’t pre-approve its training data.
ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 week ago
But you have to describe it. It doesn’t just suck in images at random. I imagine someone will remove CP when the images are reviewed. Or do you think they just download all images and add them to the training set without even looking at them?