Section 2.2? usb.org/…/USB Type-C Spec R2.0 - August 2019.pdf
Comment on Apple to Limit iPhone 15 USB-C Cables to USB 2.0 Speeds: Report
gloriousspearfish@feddit.dk 1 year agoThis is absolutely wrong. The spec mandates that USB-C ports provides at least USB 3.1 support. Also USB-C is mandated for USB 3.1.
So to be compliant every USB-C port must support USB 3.1 at least. And you cannot support USB 3.1 with anything other than a USB-C port.
hddsx@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
ScoobyDoo27@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Wtf are you talking about? The spec has a section specifically for wiring a USB 2.0 cable. Apple is one of the companies who wrote the USB spec and I’d find it pretty hard to believe they’d go against their own spec.
hackitfast@lemmy.world 1 year ago
All I can tell you is that the Pixel 7 has USB 3.2 spec.
Image
Someone else in the thread said that the Pixel 2 (2017) also abides by USB 3.1 spec. I looked it up, apparently they weren’t lying.
Though the Google site does say:
support.google.com/pixelphone/answer/7106961?hl=e…
Not sure if it still only accepts USB-C 2.0 cables as it’s maximum?
ScoobyDoo27@lemm.ee 1 year ago
You must have replied to the wrong person because I’m not arguing the pixel doesn’t have 3.2. I’m saying the USB-C spec does allow for USB 2.0. The commenter I replied to is stating absolutely wrong information.
hackitfast@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Ah my apologies