And thus the question becomes how we can craft a fairer legal system that isn’t so pay-to-win, but still maintains the core principles of property rights that allows business to, ya know, happen. Sure we could do what many naïve people on the internet want and seize the means of production, but who on earth would want to start a productive business or make productive investments in a country where the government can just up and seize your assets without justification? Just as we need protection against businesses screwing us over, we also need protection against government screwing us over. Anyone who says we should just seize assets and nationalize industries willy nilly should ask themselves if they wanna risk some ghoul like Ron DeSantis being the one with the power to do that.
As to actual answers on how to make such a system that isn’t pay-to-win but still maintains a stable system and rule of law, I don’t actually know. I’m no expert in the legal system. But I’m sure there are experts out there who have spent a lot of time thinking about these sorts of questions and have ideas on how to improve/reform.
Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
So what you’re saying is … legal systems are designed to protect the rich.
ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Yes but with arguments to back up my point so I don’t just sound like an angry teenager on reddit.
Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Ah, somehow it came off like you were saying the general population was the intended recipient of such benefits