Comment on AI driver: review of Mark Rober's LIDAR showcase
Bell@lemmy.world 5 weeks agoWhy does no one mention why they dropped LIDAR: Who do you trust when vision conflicts with LIDAR? There were constant problems on this point.
Comment on AI driver: review of Mark Rober's LIDAR showcase
Bell@lemmy.world 5 weeks agoWhy does no one mention why they dropped LIDAR: Who do you trust when vision conflicts with LIDAR? There were constant problems on this point.
OptimusPrimeDownfall@discuss.tchncs.de 5 weeks ago
Yup, but that’s going to be true in every environment. Conflicting or noisy signals are always going to be there when you have multiple sensors. Theres going to be conflicts between pure camera systems - what if a camera sensor goes buggy and starts putting out data that says there’s always a thing to the left?
More systems giving data to establish ground truth is better. Dont Boeing yourself into thinking that one sensor is good enough - that’s how you kill people.
Bell@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
No, the camera data is combined into one visual “truth” I would bet. There was a fatal accident where the radar didn’t see a truck because it shot under it. At the time the radar was more trusted than the camera. Three only way to solve that was to only have one sensor, and radar could never be the sole input.
OptimusPrimeDownfall@discuss.tchncs.de 4 weeks ago
You clearly have no clue what you’re talking about.
Bell@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I think when you’ve gone ad homonym then I won