- Until someone re do the test, we will not know.
- yes if you do it knowingly, then redo it without talking control.
- Yes and no, he did put it down as a win.
- Mark is an engineer and has a good history of using scientific process. He has previously shown that it can be combined.
I know sadly that Tesla has lost a lot of respect due to Elon, especially over the last 4 years.
Engineer is in large part about balancing cost vs features. Yes the will be cases where LIDAR is better, but it comes at high cost. Think about it what is break over point the where the 0.1% edge case where LIDAR will do better, justify the cost.
If the test that Mark show to unexpected drivers I think many humans drivers will failed. Like spoting a dark stationary object in fog or heavy rain, is very difficult.
Bell@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Why does no one mention why they dropped LIDAR: Who do you trust when vision conflicts with LIDAR? There were constant problems on this point.
OptimusPrimeDownfall@discuss.tchncs.de 5 weeks ago
Yup, but that’s going to be true in every environment. Conflicting or noisy signals are always going to be there when you have multiple sensors. Theres going to be conflicts between pure camera systems - what if a camera sensor goes buggy and starts putting out data that says there’s always a thing to the left?
More systems giving data to establish ground truth is better. Dont Boeing yourself into thinking that one sensor is good enough - that’s how you kill people.
Bell@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
No, the camera data is combined into one visual “truth” I would bet. There was a fatal accident where the radar didn’t see a truck because it shot under it. At the time the radar was more trusted than the camera. Three only way to solve that was to only have one sensor, and radar could never be the sole input.
OptimusPrimeDownfall@discuss.tchncs.de 4 weeks ago
You clearly have no clue what you’re talking about.