Comment on The Pebble Has Been Brought Back

• ricecake@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Epaper and eink are different. Eink consumes no power when idle, and epaper consumes almost no power.

  source

  • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Yet they are also the same - E Ink is an e-paper display. Electronic paper is a category for any low energy display tech that looks kinda like paper, E Ink is a very specific technology from E Ink Corporation.

    source
• abfarid@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  The watch featured a 32-millimetre (1.26 in) 144 × 168 pixel black and white memory LCD using an ultra low-power “transflective LCD”

  The problem is that e-paper is a category of displays, abnd some companies label reflective LCDs as “e-paper”. Which is subjective (and I personally heavily disagree with that categorization, cause then LCD clocks and Gameboys have “e-paper” displays, too).

  But in the comment I responded to it was said Pebble has “eink” display, which is categorically wrong, as that is a very specific proprietary technology, which is e-paper in traditional sense, like the ones in Kindles.

  source

  • Repelle@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I believe these are sharp’s memory in pixel lcds. They’re much lower power than something like the game boy screen as each pixel retains its state and doesn’t need to be refreshed from the controller constantly. I actually like these little screens quite a lot. Worse pixel density and don’t look quite as good as e-ink when static, but still really Low power and can refresh way faster and smoother when needed.

    source

    • abfarid@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I’m not criticizing the screens, they are ok and I loved my Pebble Time Steel until the battery swelled and popped off the screen. I’m just saying that calling these e-paper is a deceptive marketing strategy.

      source
  • n2burns@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Your response says, “not epaper” which is categorically wrong. I assume you meant to say “eink”

    source

    • abfarid@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      As I mentioned earlier, whether a screen type is considered e-paper is subjective. And in my opinion, reflective LCD isn’t a type of e-paper. You may disagree, but it’s not “categorically” wrong.

      source
  • FireWire400@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Where exactly is that quote from? I had a look through the product page(s) and could only find e-paper being mentioned…

    source

    • abfarid@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Quote is from Wikipedia. You can see it’s the case for both models here:

      • Pebble
      • Pebble Time

      Besides, I own a Pebble Time watch and can tell you it doesn’t perform like a typical e-paper. It has the bad viewing angles of LCD and screen goes blank when power is lost.

      source

      • FireWire400@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        That quote is on under features on the article for the original Pebble, right? Might be that the Pebble 2 used a different screen; I can’t really find info on that though.

        source

        • -> View More Comments