Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
I’ll shed no tears, even as a NAS owner, once we get equivalent capacity SSD without ruining the bank :P
Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
I’ll shed no tears, even as a NAS owner, once we get equivalent capacity SSD without ruining the bank :P
Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 weeks ago
Considering the high prices for high density SSD chips…
Why are there no 3.5" SSDs with low density chips?
jj4211@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Not enough of a market
The industry answer is if you want that much volume of storage, get like 6 edsff or m.2 drives.
3.5 inch is a useful format for platters, but not particularly needed to hold nand chips. Meanwhile instead of having to gate all those chips behind a singular connector, you can have 6 connectors to drive performance. Again, less important for a platter based strategy which is unlikely to saturate even a single 12 gb link in most realistic access patterns, but ssds can keep up with 128gb with utterly random io.
Tiny drives means more flexibility. That storage product can go into nas, servers, desktops, the thinnest laptops and embedded applications, maybe wirh tweaked packaging and cooling solutions. A product designed for hosting that many ssd boards behind a single connector is not going to be trivial to modify for any other use case, bottleneck performance by having a single interface, and pretty guaranteed to cost more to manufacturer than selling the components as 6 drives.