The same thing that’s stopping pedophiles today of course.
Comment on First Porn, Now Skin Cream? ‘Age Verification’ Bills Are Out of Control.
slacktoid@lemmy.ml 5 weeks agoWhat’s gonna stop a pedo from changing the headers to child so that they can access the child internet where all the children are? Like it’s not a great solution to me.
dojan@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
emr@lemmy.sdf.org 5 weeks ago
The idea isn’t to let sites restrict adults, just let them restrict kids. So there wouldn’t be a child internet.
slacktoid@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
Then what’s to stop a kid from spoofing the adult headers? Wouldn’t that make the whole thing needlessly complicated?
Screamium@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Of they’re old enough to figure that out then who cares?
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
watching a tiktok video on it means nothing about maturity
Petter1@lemm.ee 5 weeks ago
😂 if my son gets how to spoof headers, he can watch all the porn he wants
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 5 weeks ago
if he can do that it won’t tell anything about his intelligence, just that he has seen a video on tiktok about how to do it
slacktoid@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
But then what’s the point of age verification, it’s pointless.
ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 5 weeks ago
You seem really up in arms about this.
emr@lemmy.sdf.org 5 weeks ago
I think that’s up to device vendors giving parents decent controls and parents monitoring their kids devices. Which is admittedly not great, but still better than the honor system and more reasonable than submitting your license.
ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
So what if it was no different than now?
Nothing stopping adults from playing Roblox now, but we know why they are there
humanspiral@lemmy.ca 5 weeks ago
Lucky for the pedo, you never have to prove you are under 18, if that is what you tell the website.
gian@lemmy.grys.it 5 weeks ago
I think he means that the headers come from the device making the call, not the one receing it, so a pedo should be able to change the headers of my device which is not that easy.
Then yes, the receing end could simply ignore the header anyway, it would be way easier.slacktoid@lemmy.ml 5 weeks ago
Yes
Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 5 weeks ago
Don’t worry dude at least one person sees this is a joke
Quill7513@slrpnk.net 5 weeks ago
your understanding of what the proposed header solution is is way off base. “protecting the kids” isn’t about keeping adults from interacting with kids in online forums, it’s about keeping the kids from accidentally seeing porn (really it’s about making the lives of sex workers more dangerous). think of it like a tv v-chip but for the internet, not as a nightclub bouncer creating two different online communities and making sure they don’t interact with eachother