Comment on Brazilian court gives Apple 90 days to allow sideloading on iOS.

• limoncia@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  More freedom would be to choose the phone you want and sideload whatever you want to it.

  source

  • Winterfrost@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    [deleted]

    source

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      This is how brain-broken capitalism has made people… The concept of an effective government actually regulating a company and forcing them to spend more money to do the thing they should be doing is just completely foreign to you.

      source
• helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  That’s the whole point, to force iPhone to also have freedom.

  Android is becoming less free every year; the more Apple gets away with, the closer Android/Google will drift towards it.

  source

  • Winterfrost@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    [deleted]

    source

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      What’s the problem? Should those features only be available to people who know about jailbreaking? It seems like the pressure caused Apple to actually spend some money to add useful features that people obviously wanted. What’s the bad thing here?

      source
    • lud@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Didn’t jailbreaking pretty much die because apple made it really hard?

      source

      • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Yeah, and last I heard (a few years ago) anything running apple M# chips is not jailbreakable.

        source