Going against an agreement you agreed to abide by is not censorship. If you don’t like the agreement, don’t agree to it.
Comment on Reddit will warn users who repeatedly upvote banned content
commander@lemmings.world 3 days agoPeople get mad over government censorship, but condone corporate censorship if it’s something they want censored.
drzoidberg@lemmy.world 3 days ago
commander@lemmings.world 3 days ago
Agreeing to be censored doesn’t mean you’re not being censored.
Lol. The pro-censorship crowd really is a site to behold. Glad I’m not loyal to it!
drzoidberg@lemmy.world 3 days ago
[deleted]Malfeasant@lemm.ee 3 days ago
You don’t sound anything like Dr. Zoidberg.
JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 3 days ago
It’s not illegal for the other party to include it, but it is absolutely censorship by any definition of the word.
drzoidberg@lemmy.world 3 days ago
If you’re stupid, yes. If you have half a brain, it’s not.
If you play in the MLB and take steroids, you get suspended, and if you keep taking steroids, you get a lifetime suspension. Steroids aren’t illegal. That’s not censorship. It’s breaking the rules and facing the consequences of breaking the rules.
If you’re stupid and think facing consequences for breaking a rule you agreed to is censorship, that’s on you for being stupid.
melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 days ago
but when the corporation is slobbering all over the president’s dick while it feeds his ketamine addiction, how is it different from a part of the government?