Comment on Chat, is this true?
fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 days ago
@Sal@mander.xyz - Do you know? I couldn’t find many sources but I only speak English.
Comment on Chat, is this true?
fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 days ago
@Sal@mander.xyz - Do you know? I couldn’t find many sources but I only speak English.
Sal@mander.xyz 3 days ago
Hah, sure, let’s investigate 🕵️♂️
The term ‘Chalchiuhtlicueyecatl’ was added as a potential Aztec name to the English wikipedia page on February 15, 2025, by user ‘Mxn’.
The description of the edit is the following:
So, it is clear that the term was identified by user Mxn by performing an active online search.
If we investigate a bit further, we can see that the term Chalchiuhtlicueyecatl is described to be a name for the ‘Gulf of Mexico’ in the spanish Wikipedia: es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chalchiuhtlicueyecatl
This page was updated to include the description of Chalchiuhtlicueyecatl as the ‘Gulf of Mexico’ in September 16, 2018. I don’t have access to the citation so I don’t know if the citation specifies if this term is still known/used.
If you check the history you will find that the same ‘Mxn’ fixed a typo in this page on February 15, 2025.
So, from this sequence of events it is highly likely that the term ‘Chalchiuhtlicueyecatl’ was included into the Gulf of Mexico wiki page as a result of the user Mxn performing an active search for Aztec names for the Gulf of Mexico.
I can find no evidence of native people referring to the gulf of Mexico as ‘Chalchiuhtlicueyecatl’. I can find no mention of this becoming viral in Mexico.
I find it highly unlikely that:
More likely…
And this concludes my little investigation 🧐
fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 days ago
Haha, fantastic. Thank you for your work. ALAS! We have uncovered a deeper mystery! 🔍🔎🔎🔍🔎 🤔
Is this the book? annas-archive.org/…/fb8569c405991107b987fda775f49…
Sal@mander.xyz 3 days ago
Yes, but that version is in German. That website also has one in English: annas-archive.org/slow_download/…/0
Let’s see…
Woah, interesting. The author is José López Portillo. I thought he shared the name with a former Mexican president, but, nope, the author is a former Mexican president.
The title of the English version is a bit different, but the text appears to be the same. It is a novel, and I can find no mention of the gulf of Mexico or of Chalchiuhtlicueyecatl in this book. To me it looks like a mistake in the citation.
The claim appears to come from this text (citation 1): scribd.com/…/Dioses-prehispanicos-de-Mexico-mitos…
Image
Unfortunately, that book does not contain references nor is it stated where this claim comes from.
fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 days ago
Neat!!! Thank you.
PunnyName@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Damn, look at you being awesome!
indepndnt@lemmy.world 2 days ago
The post in the screen shot is dated February 14, 2025 though?
Sal@mander.xyz 2 days ago
How did I miss that?!
My timeline is incorrect then. Since the post from sassymetischick.bsky predates the wiki edit, it is more likely that the wiki edit was made in response to this meme, and not the other way around. This pretty invalidates what I said above…
I still can’t find any evidence of this being an actual trend, but I no longer have a good guess about the origin.
Sal@mander.xyz 2 days ago
Looking through the archived history of the talk page, I can confirm that the claim on the wiki page is derived from the viral post, and not the other way around: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…/Archive_3#Chalchiuhtlicue…
Image
mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Could that just be a timezone difference?