Comment on [deleted]
Zak@lemmy.world 3 months agoDepending on how the requirement to accept the ToS is implemented, a config file might be able to disable it and any features that depend on it.
Comment on [deleted]
Zak@lemmy.world 3 months agoDepending on how the requirement to accept the ToS is implemented, a config file might be able to disable it and any features that depend on it.
ded@lemy.lol 3 months ago
I doubt implementation of terms will be optional. It’s also possible to disable Tor in TBB
wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 months ago
You are all up and down these comments repeating this statement.
Why?
How exactly has Mozilla handled changes like this before that leads you to this conclusion? Do you have anything to back this up other than your own dogged insistence?
Surely there must be something I’m missing for you to be so adamant on this point. Please enlighten me, because to my knowledge about how all this works and has worked in the past this just seems like baseless fearmongering to me.
ded@lemy.lol 3 months ago
Because it is fucked. Firefox is fucked. Did you read what’s going on?
wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 months ago
So… entirely vibes based take. Maybe take some time to step away and come back later.
Spamming a doomerism opinion, when not backed up by anything but feelings, helps nobody. It’s an overactive immune response. The fever worse than the illness your body is trying to burn out using it.
I get that it feels like the world is going to shit, and especially when things you thought were trustworthy start doing this, it’s a blow. But this shit (repeated as fucking much as you have repeared it) makes the community, and people who need a non-corporate controlled browser, weaker and more vulnerable.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 months ago
Six.