There probably wouldn’t be a “9/11” but there would be a bunch of angry white dudes just wanting to kill black people for some fucked up reason. dylan roof and the christchurch shooter aren’t gonna go away just because the state goes away
Comment on How would a stateless society handle serious threats such as mass murder and terrorism?
Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 week ago
Mass murderers would be handled about the same, ie. taken down by local security after the fact.
Terrorism would be less likely to happen; without an organized state to terrorize, what’s the point? There’s no one to agree to the terrorists’ demands.
IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week ago
Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 week ago
Idk mate, I feel like most anarchists are pretty fucken vocal about how we should deal with fascists. What would happen to them within a stateless society is probably what we say should happen 🤷♀️
Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 week ago
And, like now, those acts would mostly be handled by taking out the shooter after the fact.
Hopefully without a centralized for-profit news apparatus making the perpetrator infamous and inspiring copycats, though honestly we could achieve that under the current system of government.
wabafee@lemmy.world 1 week ago
There will be violent gangs that would pop up especially when there is no state. So there is still Terrorism unless I misunderstood the term.