Comment on New report skewers Coalition’s contentious nuclear plan – and reignites Australia’s energy debate

4oreman@lemy.lol ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• BrainInABox@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  If only. Might actually get some sensible energy infrastructure programs then

  source

  • 4oreman@lemy.lol ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    i thought china had bad air quality

    source

    • Salvo@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Mainly due to the density of the population.

      The Australian population is quite sparse, mainly because we never got our Multifunction Polis.

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multifunction_Polis

      source

      • Aussieiuszko@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Mostly due to the industrial pollution actually.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
      • 4oreman@lemy.lol ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        interesting, thanks for sharing

        source
    • beeng@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Not anymore. They hit peak coal already it looks and trending cleaner everyday

      source

      • 4oreman@lemy.lol ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        that’s unexpected good news

        source
  • MisterFrog@aussie.zone ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I’m still really unsure why some socialists have decided that because China carries the flag of socialism, that it means they’re automatically good at everything, ever. And everything bad about it is western propaganda.

    I’m a socialist, hell, I even like China in many regards, much more than many of my fellow Australians.

    But damn, why so many people on Lemmy.ml stanning for them? Makes no sense.

    That being said, much of the infrastructure they have, is indeed nice (all the massive amounts of coal we sell them, notwithstanding).

    But there are a bunch of inefficiencies and issues.

    Ya know, like any other country.

    China isn’t a utopia, it’s a place, with good and bad points.

    source