conciselyverbose@kbin.social 10 months ago
A. I don't actually feel bad for anyone because if you're involved in NFTs in any way, you're begging to be scammed. There is no legitimate use for NFTs.
B. This seems like blatant illegal fraud. You can't just advertise "get this cut of all transactions forever" to get people to join, then say "just kidding" once they include their "art" in your shitty scam. They're entitled to their shitty cut of your shitty transaction, and you can't hand wave it away by pointing to fine print when you sold the product very clearly making that claim.
Bjornir@programming.dev 10 months ago
There are uses for NFT, but it is clearly not what they are famous for.
NFT aren’t pictures of monke, they are a way to authenticate something in a decentralised way, so no trust in another entity needed. The picture isn’t the NFT, and that is why you can just right click-copy it.
You can’t however just copy the NFT, the actual token. Having a token that’s verifiably owned by someone is useful for certain things. It’s like a certificate of authenticity, but digital.
magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 10 months ago
Digital certificates has already existed for half a century. There’s nothing new. A certificate doesn’t get any more legitimate just because it’s recorded on a blockchain.
bjorney@bjorney.lol 10 months ago
Yes but NFTs are held in trust by you, not a 3rd party business. If you want to sell your NFT to a friend you can do that without brokering the exchange through a middleman who can/will charge a cut
atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Don’t blockchain brokers charge a transaction fee?
kitonthenet@kbin.social 10 months ago
This is still solved by certificates, I can make my own self signed certificate that says it me and sign whatever I want. The only thing that crypto “solves” is over the wire man in the middle attacks, which aren’t even really a problem in the modern internet
magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 10 months ago
How you transact the ownership of NFTs is a different story. I’m reacting to the claim that NFT is “like a certificate of authenticity, but digital”, which is not unique to NFTs at all.
This claim is also often misunderstood, since the NFT can only verify the authenticity of the certificate itself, not the art/asset it’s pointing to.
I can easily create an NFT of Mona Lisa. The blockchain will see no problem with it at all. Heck, I can create 1000 NFTs of Mona Lisa if I want.
orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 10 months ago
This sounds completely logical, until you realize it’s for selling JPGs and expecting them to only exist in that one buyer’s hands.
sab@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Are there any practical (non-theoretical) uses for NFTs that couldn’t be done otherwise though?
orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 10 months ago
insert word jumble about unrealistic scenarios made up in my basement while stoned
Maturin@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Basically anything that is currently traded on any digital or quasi-digital exchange but relies ultimately on a paper/manual backend.
sab@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Can you give a real life example of that being applied?
Bjornir@programming.dev 10 months ago
www.hongkiat.com/blog/nft-use-cases/
It is just a tool, it’s what you do with it that gives its worth. Monkey pictures… Well that’s not worth anything
conciselyverbose@kbin.social 10 months ago
NFTs have never once not been very blatant fraud.
Bjornir@programming.dev 10 months ago
NFT aren’t monkey pictures.
conciselyverbose@kbin.social 10 months ago
I know what they are. They're a "solution" to a problem that doesn't exist and very probably never will exist.
They have never once been used for anything even neutral. Every single case has been outright malicious.
JayK117@aussie.zone 10 months ago
I reckon the meeting about the tokens went something like “okay, how can we monetise this?”, “Okay hear me out here… monkeys!.. digital monkeys!”