Comment on Over 20M 'people' listed as 100+ years old in the SS database?

• Muffi@programming.dev ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  The language wasn’t the point. The point is that if this data is being retrieved by these young clowns, we can’t trust any of it. There is no good excuse for Elon to have given them this much responsibility.

  source

  • redut_nl@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    There is no good excuse for that is hasn’t been fixed before (and that includes Trump). You need to know where your tax money is going. Obama told the electorate he was going to slash bureaucracy and wasting tax money but didn’t do it. Apparently you need someone like Musk/Trump. Sometimes you have to break some eggs to make an omelette, If you are always cautious the media will stop you because they will always find a ‘victim’.

    source

    • Tinidril@midwest.social ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Just because the field exists doesn’t mean it’s critical that it be filled in. We have no idea whether this is even a problem that needs fixing. Maybe a project was underway to fix it until Obama killed it as unnecessary bureaucracy. Bottom line, you don’t have the slightest idea what you’re bitching about.

      source

      • redut_nl@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        So death field set to FALSE! and age 140 is proper data? That needs to be fixed. Whatever the reason is. Period. No auditor should accept that.

        source

        • -> View More Comments