But WDC is down almost 10% in the last 10 days
Comment on SanDisk's Name is Now Mud
Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 10 months agoI hope shareholders are seeing this and selling.
Sandisk has been a wholly owned subsidiary of Western Digital since 2016.
WD's share price is up ~25% this year...
Bell@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 10 months ago
Good point. I was looking from when this problem was first discovered vs when this news hit as you did.
root@lemmy.world 10 months ago
They’re saving a ton by not matching our 401ks anymore
Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 10 months ago
Sorry, I don't know the term. What is a 401k?
chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org 10 months ago
“401k” is an American term of art. It’s like a pension fund except you’re directly investing into the stock market and not pooling risk with anyone else. Money contributed to a 401k isn’t taxed until you retire, but in exchange you can only contribute direct earnings from the job sponsoring your account.
As part of a benefits package, some employers also offer contribution “matching”. It’s very similar to the concept of employers matching charitable donations – for every personal dollar you put in, they chip in as well. How much they contribute will also vary. Some places will do dollar-for-dollar matching up to a maximum salary percentage (e.g.: If I earn $50k and get 5% matching, the employer will match the first $2500 I contribute). Other comapnies will instead contribute pennies on the dollar at a fixed percentage rate (e.g.: If I save the annual maximum of $22,500 and get 5% matching, the employer will contribute $1,125). And yes – it’s never a pleasant surprise when you’re expecting the good matching and instead get the shity matching.
In any case, because 401k matching is technically only a job benefit, there aren’t many rules against employers reneging on it. It’s one of the first corners that tend to get cut in workplaces where the boss doesn’t have to look his underlings in the eye on a regular basis.
obinice@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Surely actual pension contributions would be better than having your employer partially fund what is essentially a big financial gamble?
Or… Is that the idea? Another way for US employers to screw their fellow citizens over and give them as little as possible in return for their lives of labour?
The world just makes me sadder and sadder. There’s just no real good news any more, only bad :-(
WarmSoda@lemm.ee 10 months ago
It’s a way for companies to act like they’re helping you retire instead of providing a pension.
briongloid@aussie.zone 10 months ago
Retirement fund.
Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 10 months ago
Shit. That would suck.