Hell, it can filter out tech people too. I’m a programmer by trade, but I almost dipped on lemmy because the onboarding is confusing enough. Like, I obviously (mostly) figured it out, but I did consider going “eh fuck it” and dipping. The site is ultimately a luxury and not a requirement, so effort or confusion required to get all started up is also something that’ll drive me to consider it not all worth it for some social media I’m not even sure I want to be a part of yet.
Comment on Bad UX is keeping the majority of people away from Lemmy
AnonomousWolf@lemm.ee 1 week agoNot necessarily, but we don’t want a accidental filter that filters out non tech savvy people. We want all kinds of people on Lemmy
eronth@lemmy.world 1 week ago
3dmvr@lemm.ee 1 week ago
I think the verifcation question might trip ppl up, just not used to needing one or it being an actual answer, or copying and pasting for it, I signed up for a few and each time I felt like I was doing it wrong
manicdave@feddit.uk 1 week ago
It’s not difficult though. They just can’t be arsed and are making excuses for being comfortable and lazy. If there was a $100 million marketing budget and their favourite celebrity was here, they’d sit an hour long entrance exam. The best we can do is make it fun enough here that people want to comment.
AnonomousWolf@lemm.ee 1 week ago
We should try to do both, give a good UX and make it fun.
Everyone benefits from good UX
fishos@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Exactly. If this minimal effort is keeping people out - GOOD. If you can’t put the bare minimum effort in, then you’ll just be another mindless TikTok type person and we really don’t need those.
Cubes@lemm.ee 1 week ago
A counterargument to this is that a lot of people (who would put in the minimal effort) don’t come here instead of Reddit because their niche community isn’t represented well. So while it’s nice to have higher effort/engagement members, you can’t possibly cover all of what most people want to see without a lot of those.