Comment

Comment on China is quietly pushing ahead with massive 50,000Mbps broadband rollout to leapfrog rest of the world on internet speeds

diffusive@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

Written in Switzerland from my 25GBps symmetric connection (for like 60$/month) that I have for a couple of years 🤷‍♂️

Also for personal use the difference between 1Gbps and 25 (or, I guess, 100GBps) is essentially zero… your everyday connection is via WiFi (good luck to get more than 1GBps there) or on a home server/NAS/workstation where likely you run batch jobs where the difference between 1 minute or 5 minutes is not a huge deal (and yes I am not saying 1 vs 25 because at that speed generally the bottleneck is the place where you are getting data from)

source

Sort:hotnew top

QuarterSwede@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Not to mention the server is the bottleneck at that point. I have access to 2.5Gb/2.5Gb but only pay for 500/500 because, even that is faster than most servers, and of course all the mobile devices aren’t pushing more than 400 on WiFi.

source
AA5B@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Plus what consumer can even support higher bandwidth? Computers are starting to come with 2.5G Ethernet, switches are coming down in price but still pretty expensive for home use (and complex), and any existing wiring is likely close to topped out.

For anything faster, you’re all too likely to need enterprise equipment for a lot more money and a lot more complexity.

I’ve briefly considered updating to faster internet but

I don’t have a rational need

I’d have to replace switches and wiring

I don’t have the time to commit

even building a file server that can sustain that bandwidth is a challenge
source
frezik@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
Interesting–when I made a similar argument on Reddit some years ago, networking geniuses assured me that they needed more than 1Gbps to play lag-free games. This on /r/programming, no less.

source
- Subdivide6857@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Lol! 10Mbps is usually more than enough.
  
  source
- Opisek@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  
  /r/programming
  
  There’s your culprit
  
  source
  - frezik@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    You can always hope it’s better than it actually is.
    
    source
Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
I’m sure I have the same ISP as you, but so far I didn’t splurge to buy 10G or 25G gear.

If you don’t mind telling, what router and switches did you go for?

Or did you go the Michael Stapelberg route?

source
- diffusive@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Kinda, yeah. Gaming workstation + Network card (and optics) from fs.com + Nixos.
  
  This setup has the benefit that my workstation has also all possible bandwidth. Services run in nixos containers (that are awesome!) for isolation from the routing.
  
  source
lemmyingly@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
I have a 40Mbps down, 5Mbps up connection for $30. Consider yourself as real lucky.

source
- Blackmist@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Yeah, I was on that until the other week, when my area finally got upgraded to 1Gbps.
  
  It’s nice for big downloads (and with game sizes what they are now, that bit is a big difference), but for regular use? Not really a vast change. It’s nice that your bandwidth doesn’t suddenly vanish when one of your unattended devices decides to wake up and download a 20GB update for a game you haven’t played in months I guess.
  
  source
  - lemmyingly@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    I think you’ve misread my comment or there is some misunderstanding.
    
    Just in case, it’s a misread, my speed is 40 Mega bit per second - not 40 mega byte per second.
    
    I have to choose what I want to do and do those things with consideration, otherwise things like streaming will buffer a lot.
    
    If you thought I said 40MBps, then I’d agree, as i imagine the difference between 320Mbps and 1Gbps won’t be noticed unless you’re timing large downloads.
    
    source
    Blackmist@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    Yeah, I know. I was on 30Mbps. Took like 5 minutes to download a gigabyte. Now it takes around 10 seconds.
    
    But most video streaming sites are well below that, and web pages are a few MB tops. The only noticeable difference is when doing larger downloads.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
- ThermonuclearCactus@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  lol I have 3Mbps down .5 up for 40$
  
  source
  - lemmyingly@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    RIP. I guess you live in the back end of no where.
    
    source
- diffusive@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  I do 🙂
  
  source
kalleboo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
I have symmetrical 10 Gbps at home ($30/mo) and I’ll agree. When it’s nice when you have big updates, for most households 1 Gbps is going to be just fine. As you say, the vast majority of users are bottlenecked by Wi-Fi.

The bigger crime are all the asymmetrical connections that people on technologies like Cable TV networks have, where you get 1-2 Gbps down but only something tiny like 50 Mbps up. This results in crappy video calls, makes off-site/remote backups unfeasible, etc etc.

source
- imouto@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  
  you get 1-2 Gbps down but only something tiny like 50 Mbps up
  
  That’s exactly what you get in Australia, even if you have FTTP, 95% of ISPs only offer up to 1000/50Mbps, and that’s if you live in the big cities. Mine costs ~US$70/mo btw. And they have a ‘typical evening speed’ that drops to 860/42Mbps (I’ve never heard of such a concept outside Australia. Yeah, totally not a scam).
  
  A handful ISPs offer 1000/400Mbps and you’ll be looking at ~US$125/mo. Anything faster you’ll be handed with astronomical commercial bills.
  
  source
- ftbd@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Do you actually have 10G switches and network cards, or is everything behind your router on 1G?
  
  source
  - kalleboo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    I have a cheap noname chinese switch with 2x10gbit ports and 4x2.5 Gbps ports, so I have the 10 Gbit ports to the internet and my computer, and use a 2.5 gbps port for my NAS, everything else is 1 gbit
    
    source
  - frezik@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    Not OP, but I have my NAS and my office PC on 10Gbps SFP+ fiber, but that’s so I can have fast speeds to my NAS. Spinning platters are now the limiting factor on throughput, and it’ll be a while before SSDs come down in price enough for the kind of data hoarding volume I have. Roughly needs to be cut in half two more times, which is maybe closer than we all think.
    
    2.5Gbps switches are generally good enough for home use while using plain copper wires, but I use a lot of old enterprise hardware on my network. Enterprise hardware never heard of 2.5Gbps ethernet.
    
    Also, I found out my Unifi Edgerouter X maxed out at 500Mbps unless I shut off a lot of features. Upgraded to an OPNsense box.
    
    source
thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
data drive arrays are so fucking slow

I swear to god! half of my job at work is waiting for the platter drives to give the data to the solid state arrays on the other side of a fiber connection

source
- frezik@midwest.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Also doesn’t help that SMB is single threaded. Completely mismatched for the era of multicore processors and SSDs.
  
  source