Comment on AI Generated X
muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 1 month agoIts not really generation its just summarisation of human generated text.
Assuming it’s right.
99% of the time it’s hallucinating, inventing two extra authors for the text (each with six fingers), misattributing a quote to at least one of them, and n otoriously missing the point of the article in favour of developing a more click-baity summary.
Go read the source and review the model page on huggingface and u will find thats not at all true for my implementation. The model im using provides a summary 60% identical to that of a human summary and >95% accurate in maintaining the original meaning.
Plus 99% is one hell of a an exaggeration.
RQG@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Exactly. That means new thoughts and ideas can’t ever come from what is currently called Ai.