Comment

RQG@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

I’m just here to say I don’t want to read AI generated texts. Not even when marked as such. I prefer human to human communication. Generation quality isn’t there yet by a long shot.

source

Sort:hotnew top

muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
Its not really generation its just summarisation of human generated text.

source
- RQG@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Exactly. That means new thoughts and ideas can’t ever come from what is currently called Ai.
  
  source
- lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Assuming it’s right.
  
  99% of the time it’s hallucinating, inventing two extra authors for the text (each with six fingers), misattributing a quote to at least one of them, and n otoriously missing the point of the article in favour of developing a more click-baity summary.
  
  source
  - muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee ⁨2⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    Go read the source and review the model page on huggingface and u will find thats not at all true for my implementation. The model im using provides a summary 60% identical to that of a human summary and >95% accurate in maintaining the original meaning.
    
    Plus 99% is one hell of a an exaggeration.
    
    source