Okay, but imagine if you could have one really rich guy impregnate a thousand captive comatose women at once, to improve efficiency.
Comment on I think we might be leaving the "boring" part of this dystopia
HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 week ago
The amount of babies isn’t the issue America, it’s the fact that we can’t afford them.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 week ago
WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 week ago
What I really hate about longtermism is that it actually tells us nothing about what policies are best, as we don’t know what paths will lead to the best future.
You could argue that low taxes on billionaires will give them the resources needed to do space colonisation. Thus, in the long term, not taxing billionaires now is good. Or you could argue that a robust social safety net and UBI is the best path to a long term best future. How many Einsteins throughout history died illiterate peasants? By providing resources for everyone, we maximize our chances of the truly talented having a shot at elevating us all through new science and discoveries.
Hell, I could even justify a nuclear war through longtermism. Economies grow more worn-in and sclerotic over time. Every so often you need a historical arsonist like Alexander the Great or Genghis Khan to run through an area, burn the existing order to ashes, and give people a chance to start again. Existing elites prevent necessary change. And often the only way to remove them is to burn everything down. On the next attempt at civilization, they can learn from their predecessor’s mistakes. For example, destroying the fossil fuel industry now is effectively impossible; they’re simply far too entrenched and powerful. By voluntarily starting a global thermonuclear war, we will smash their power. Civilization can then rebuild powered entirely by solar and wind. Yes, we lose 90% of the human population today, but we prevent total human extinction via complete biosphere collapse, which appears to be the road we are on now. From the long term perspective, deliberately starting a global thermonuclear war is the only rational choice.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Climate Change is good for humanity because killing off the bulk of life on earth will give us a fresh slate to build on.
~ Op-Ed at the Atlantic or WSJ or some other smug contrarian navel gazers warehouse
SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 6 days ago
What if they are a rich corpse?
Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 1 week ago
And that the government won’t do shit-all to help them. A baby born to a corpse is not going to have a good life in America.
HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 week ago
I just threw up in my mouth a little when you pointed that out. Yes the article says that too, but this accurate re-wording kinda really makes it “click”
SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 6 days ago
What if they are a rich corpse?