It’s alright, the government agrees with me.
No more blowjobs on NDIS dollars.
Guess your strawman will be offing itself soon.
It’s alright, the government agrees with me.
No more blowjobs on NDIS dollars.
Guess your strawman will be offing itself soon.
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 months ago
Lol, because that’s the arbiter of truth amirite?
Now they’ll have more budget for their own escorts.
Cypher@aussie.zone 2 months ago
Hmmm looks like that’s an argument I never made, let’s check the definition of a straw man argument.
Nothing about the straw man fallacy excludes hyperbole.
Under examples we can see
Oh you thought I was talking about the very real possibility of someone wanting to commit suicide due to disability…. Tsk tsk.
As I said right from the outset, if there is no science to say that paying for hookers is a more effective use of money than other support methods then it shouldn’t be paid for by public funds.
No evidence, no funds, Im a happy man.
Do try to keep up.
Taleya@aussie.zone 2 months ago
You’re literally complaining how a tiny fraction of your tax that ends up in the NDIS might pay for fulfill the sexual needs of someone who otherwise wouldn’t have them fulfilled is lowering your quality of life.
You really don’t have the grounds to fling accusations of logical fallacies around here.
Cypher@aussie.zone 2 months ago
You haven’t refuted my argument in the slightest.
Every cent I pay in taxes that are spent on something I don’t benefit from is literally money I no longer have to improve my own quality of life.
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 months ago
Lol, I love when clowns own themselves.
Cypher@aussie.zone 2 months ago
You’re amusing enough but I wouldn’t call you a clown.