Comment on X has started reversing the throttling on some of the sites, including NYTimes'
MysticKetchup@lemmy.world 1 year agoPeople have invested a lot into Twitter. They’ve built social networks there, they have brands or client bases for people who make money and it’s also just where most people are. Leaving means giving up most of what they need or want Twitter for. It’s a captive audience
Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com 1 year ago
Yeah, it’s the same problem for people who rely on exposure to get business. Artists, for example, are pretty much locked into Twitter. Because they rely on a large user base for their work to be seen and spread. And switching to another site (even if it has better quality of life) isn’t feasible if the massive user base doesn’t already exist there.
5BC2E7@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s not infeasible to post the same comments or media to multiple sites
galloog1@lemmy.world 1 year ago
And that’s exactly what needs to happen. Organizations post to both and get the benefits of both. Even better, it allows for better segmentation of user types. Lemmy and Mastodon users tend towards a different demographics by self selection with no privacy infringements needed. The same applies to the classic differences between Twitter and Facebook.
thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com 1 year ago
Twitter really isn’t where most artists have their followings, though. Instagram is much better suited for it.
Fisk400@feddit.nu 1 year ago
That depends on the kind of art you do. The more “lucrative” kinds of art is not allowed on Instagram.