Comment on Mastodon's federation consistency is laughably bad.

cerement@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

• ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Bluesky has basically no moderation. What it has is really good user level blocking and the ability to share those block lists with others.

  source

  • damon@lemmy.world ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    What’s different about the fediverse? There’s mute lists, block lists, keyword filters, they have a third party company plus a trust and safety team. They’ve taken down plenty of accounts. So again what’s no moderation? What’s better moderation and tooling on fedi? I’ve seen CSAM on Mastodon yet not on Bluesky

    source

    • ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      What’s different about the fediverse is that I can pick an instance and know that the admins who run it will ban bigots, rather than just leaving the bigots alone, and telling me to ignore them.

      That’s a pretty important distinction to me.

      source
  • Kichae@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Yeah, block list sharing is something that has to come to the fediverse, and it needs to be platform agnostic.

    source
• neatchee@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I’m curious what you mean by “better moderation”? Are you comparing to specific instances? Or do you mean consistency, because it’s more centralized?

  source

  • cerement@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    user level moderation: blocking, muting, and filtering – and block lists, mute lists, and filter lists can all be shared and subscribed and updated

    source

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      User-level moderation isn’t moderation. It’s a downloading of responsibilities onto the user, but it’s not moderation. It’s the opposite of moderation.

      source