presenting that human eye with the most up to date graphical developments provide a (however slight but still measurable) performance edge over slower refresh rates.
Comment on LG’s first 480Hz OLED gaming monitor is $1,000
JoMiran@lemmy.ml 1 year ago
What’s the point if the human eye can’t see beyond 30fps?
crawancon@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
It’s okay, I understood your comment without you needing to put that stupid “/s” in
JoMiran@lemmy.ml 1 year ago
I thought it would have been obvious but the number of downvotes says otherwise.
horse_tranquilizers@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Dont display downvotes, save that cortisol
Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
It was obvious to me!
f2sfljLhdtTZ@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That’s not entirely correct. Have you tried using a 60hz and 165hz monitor? The difference is not slight.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Number go up