Better marketing
Comment on Bluesky says it won’t train AI on your posts
daggermoon@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Why is this taking off but not Mastadon?
Evotech@lemmy.world 1 day ago
mke@programming.dev 1 day ago
Which marketing and better how, exactly?
Can anyone please point me an example of Bluesky marketing that isn’t word of mouth or large-event headlines on the news?
Woovie@lemmy.world 1 day ago
no, this place only circle jerks about the fediverse blindly and hates anything with a modicum of attachment to reality.
Takios@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
Barrier of entry is marginally lower. With mastodon you’ll have to make a decision on what instance you’re creating your account. With Bluesky there’s just Bluesky.
marx2k@lemmy.world 1 day ago
With bluesky ,the sign up has a section where you choose a server. The bluesky server is prefilled. Otherwise you add your own.
But not having that default option and instead having to have the user go research and figure out which server to use is an immediate turn off.
zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 4 hours ago
Mastodon has one big, official node, too, though: joinmastodon.com.
DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Yep. 100% this.
Bluesky gas the hyper casual "barrier’ of entry that Twitter had
0xD@infosec.pub 1 day ago
It’s easier to use and has a recommendation algorithm.
zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 4 hours ago
How is it easier to use?
ColdWater@lemmy.ca 1 hour ago
Because it has just one instance and choosing an instance is too hard to Twitter users