Comment on Bluesky says it won’t train AI on your posts

daggermoon@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

• Evotech@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Better marketing

  source

  • mke@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Which marketing and better how, exactly?

    Can anyone please point me an example of Bluesky marketing that isn’t word of mouth or large-event headlines on the news?

    source

    • Woovie@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      no, this place only circle jerks about the fediverse blindly and hates anything with a modicum of attachment to reality.

      source
• 0xD@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  It’s easier to use and has a recommendation algorithm.

  source

  • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    How is it easier to use?

    source

    • ColdWater@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Because it has just one instance and choosing an instance is too hard to Twitter users

      source

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        Bluesky gives you the option to choose an insurance, too.

        source
• Takios@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Barrier of entry is marginally lower. With mastodon you’ll have to make a decision on what instance you’re creating your account. With Bluesky there’s just Bluesky.

  source

  • marx2k@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    With bluesky ,the sign up has a section where you choose a server. The bluesky server is prefilled. Otherwise you add your own.

    But not having that default option and instead having to have the user go research and figure out which server to use is an immediate turn off.

    source

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Mastodon has one big, official node, too, though: joinmastodon.com.

      source
  • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Yep. 100% this.

    Bluesky gas the hyper casual "barrier’ of entry that Twitter had

    source