There were a lot of really good images like that well before AI. Anyone remember Photoshop Friday?
Comment on Not likely to be AI-generated or Deepfake
pennomi@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job. Just because it’s not AI doesn’t mean it’s real.
But also the detector is probably wrong - it’s likely an AI image using a different model than the detector was trained to detect.
db2@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Sparky@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
Can we bring that back?
Paradachshund@lemmy.today 1 year ago
There’s a sort of… Sheen, to a lot AI images. Obviously you can prompt this away if you know what you’re doing, but its developing a bit of a look to my eye when people don’t do that.
Mac@mander.xyz 1 year ago
They’re often too smooth.
arken@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It could, but the double spiral in the shell indicates AI to me. Snail shells don’t grow like that. If it was a manual job, someone would have used a picture of a real shell.
fishbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
Also the fact that the grain on the side of the shell is perpendicular to the grain on the top, and it changes where the cat ear comes up in front of it.
Very telltale sign of AI is a change of pattern in something when a foreground object splits it.
Not saying it’s always a guarantee, but it’s a common quirk and it’s pretty easy to identify.
Hackworth@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time.
fishbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 year ago
Your meme is ancient and dusty and it makes me feel old. Stop it.
rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Snail shells don’t grow like that but this is clearly a snat, not a snail.
arken@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Even cnailshells would have to adhere to the basic laws of conchology though
pennomi@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Agreed. The aggressive depth of field is another smoking gun that usually indicates an AI image.