The plan for bluesky to for people to start their own instances and decentralize.
Comment on X's idiocy is doing wonders for Bluesky.
blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 1 year ago
I’d say mastodon is a better choice, mostly so that you’re not beholden to yet another profit-focused tech corporation. I’m sure Bluesky is fine right now, but once they have their userbase they will shift to monetization - and you may regret letting yourself become entrenched in the world they control. They’re not doing it for your benefit.
That said, I’ve come to understand that a lot of people kind of like having their content feed controlled by others. When they only see what they ask for, they get bored. So I’m expecting Bluesky to always be bigger than Mastodon.
nexguy@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s all cyclical anyway. No social media company will reign forever. We’ve already seen a number of them rise and fall. It’s kinda like how different civilizations gained and lost dominance throughout history.
Freefall@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Toys-R-Us fell…nothing is forever.
Hackworth@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Aren’t they in Macy’s now? Wait, is Macy’s still a thing?
cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
mastodon blew it by attacking people who had legitimate concerns about the service during the first migration.
Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
that and the whole “ui sucks” part of it.
I used to bSky quite a bit more than my mastodon account, it made more sense to operate and had better documentation/help
thenexusofprivacy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
Yep. And also, like I said in …thenexus.today/bluesky-atmosphere-fediverse/
blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Mastodon isn’t a person. So I don’t know who you are talking about when you say ‘mastodon was attacking people’. I certainly didn’t see anything like that. Perhaps you have an example link for context?