Are you suggesting that there are some lies involved in this? If so, you shouid be specific about which lies you’re referring to. Without the specifics this just seems like FUD.
Comment on T-Mobile, AT&T oppose unlocking rule, claim locked phones are good for users
Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Missing in this thread, courts are not known for their technological literacy. So companies just lie to them. Like, all the time. This isn’t meant to withstand consumer scrutiny.
intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
The idea that locking phones is good for customers is a great example.
reksas@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
isnt lying to court felony?
Chewget@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
For poor people, maybe
RangerJosie@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
This.
Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Yeah but you have to get caught lying. And the courts aren’t very literate with tech and economic stuff. You’d basically need to create a memo that says, “lol we lied!”
reksas@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
someone should try to inform relevant courts about technical things, no idea how but those corporations shouldnt be allowed to get away with crime
Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
You’d be interested in groups like the EFF and Amicus briefs.