Comment

Comment on Reddit says it is not covered by new Online Safety Code as it has moved its jurisdiction to the Netherlands

towerful@programming.dev ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

It requires them to restrict certain categories of video, so that users cannot share content on cyberbullying, promoting eating disorders, promotion of self harm or incitement to hatred on a number of grounds.

Yeh, fuck censorship. Let’s all be shitbags and do that stuff instead!

source

Sort:hotnew top

yeahiknow3@lemmings.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
To be fair, censorship on Reddit is already very very aggressive. I was banned for saying “yay” on a news thread about the death of the queen.

source
SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
You don’t have to be a porn star or even a porn consumer to oppose laws banning porn.

And you don’t have to be a shitbag to recognize that, while well-intentioned, censorship is still censorship.

I have absolutely no love whatsoever for the people who would spread such crap. I would love to get rid of it. But banning the speech doesn’t do that. It’s like smashing the altimeter in the airplane and then declaring that you’re not crashing anymore. But the reality is, smashing instruments in the airplane is never a great idea whether you are crashing or not. It just prevents you from seeing things you don’t want to. And you get hurt in the process.

Censorship, historically, has never ended up anywhere good.

source
- towerful@programming.dev ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
  Porn is performed by consenting adults and consumed by consenting adults.
  That’s why porn made from human trafficking, revenge porn (ie leaking nudes of an ex) etc are illegal in most sane countries.
  The idea being that porn doesn’t hurt anyone.
  
  Hate speech is harmful. It’s purpose is to hurt people.
  So yeh, it should be illegal.
  I have no issues discussing hate speech. I do have issues with hate speech being used.
  
  source
  - SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    There’s a big difference between hate speech and revenge porn.
    
    A person has rights to their likeness and image. That’s why anybody who goes in front of a camera, be it a porn star or a model or an actor, signs a ‘model release’ giving the photographer authorization to publicize and sell their images. Without that simple one page contract, nothing in the photo shoot can be published. Porn actors do that. And in fact, they usually do it on video, where the actor holds up their driver’s license and says ‘my name is blah blah I am a pornographic actor and I am consenting to have sex on camera today and authorize this production company to publicize and sell the resulting video’ or something like that. Revenge porn victims have made no such agreement, and while the penalties are stronger because of the harm it causes them, the legal basis for having any penalty at all is simply that they did not consent to having their likeness and image publicized.
    
    Hate speech has no such issue. It may be harmful to a person or group, but if you remove the very broad ‘hatred’ label, it becomes just an opinion that would otherwise be protected speech.
    
    The other problem is that what considers hatred is very much subjective. For example, if I say wanting to own a gun is evidence of mental illness, a lot of people on Lemmy will agree with that and I will probably get upvotes. If I say wanting to use the bathroom of other than your biological genetic sex is evidence of mental illness, I will probably get banned. What is the difference between the two? Supporting LGBT rights is popular, supporting the second amendment is not. So you create the situation where the only difference between a valid opinion and an invalid one is whether or not it’s accepted mainstream, and that’s a bad way to go.
    
    Also, in a free country, it is generally considered that expressing an opinion which may be detrimental to others is not in itself considered bad. If I say that people over 80 years old should require a yearly driving test, that’s a valid position for me to have and nobody will call me ageist for saying it. If I say that Donald Trump should be arrested rather than elected, that is directly detrimental to a person but it would get me upvotes here. If I said that being Republican is evidence of mental illness, that is directly prejudicial against an entire group which has many different reasons for believing as they do, and it would probably get me upvotes also.
    
    My point is, hate speech as a concept is difficult to define and when you try to ban it with censorship you are just starting down a slippery slope that will have the opposite of the desired effect. You legitimize the counterculture and do nothing to stop the real problem, the actual hatred.
    
    source
    wanderingmagus@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    How about incitements to violence and outright explicit disinformation/misinformation, like:
    
    [group] should be [violent act]
    
    [group] are [dehumanizing pejorative] that deserve [violent act]
    
    [dogwhistle for the actual Nazis, like the 14 words, terminology specifically referencing the Final Solution, etc]
    
    [hard r] are [extreme dehumanizing pejorative] and don’t deserve [human rights]
    
    [violent or repulsive act] the [slur]
    
    “Despite only making up 13%…”
    
    “Whites create and forget, [slur]s copy and remember…”
    
    source
    -> View More Comments
    towerful@programming.dev ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago
    It’s not difficult to define.
    It’s about people’s choices.
    
    People can choose to own a gun, choose to want to own a gun, choose to own a whole armoury.
    I think owning a gun is stupid. I live in a country that successfully regulates guns.
    Saying “I think gun owners are stupid” isn’t hate speech because they have chosen to own a gun.
    If I said “gun owners should use their guns in themselves” that becomes hate speech because it’s wishing harm on them.
    
    People choose to be Republicans, trumps choices in life are why he is where he is.
    Hate trump because of what he does, not because he has blonde hair.
    
    People don’t choose to be gay, or be trans, or be Jewish, or be black, or be short or whatever.
    Which is another way opinions can become hate speech.
    If I said “I think gun owners are stupid” that isn’t hate speech.
    If I said “I think black people are stupid” that becomes hate speech because it is grouping people by something they have no control over.
    
    source