Comment on Nobel Prize 2024
nialv7@lemmy.world 1 week agothat heavily depends on how you define “intelligence”. if you insist on “think, reason and behave like a human”, then no, we don’t have “Artificial Intelligence” yet. on the other hand if you consider the ability to play chess or go intelligence, the answer is different.
minyakcurry@monyet.cc 1 week ago
Honestly I would consider BFS/DFS artificial intelligence (and I think most introductory AI courses agree). But yea it’s a definition game and I don’t think most people qualify intelligence as purely human-centric. Simple tasks like pattern recognition already count as a facet of intelligence.
Adalast@lemmy.world 1 week ago
I forget the exact quote or who said it, but the gist is that a species cannot be considered sapient (intelligent) on an interplanetary/interstellar stage until they have discovered Calculus. I prefer to use that as my bar for the sapience of those around me as well.
NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Weeeell, sheeiiiiit