Comment

Comment on [Cory Doctorow] With An Audacious Plan To Halt The Internet’s Enshittification And Throw It Into Reverse

<- View Parent

helenslunch@feddit.nl ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

I don’t know how to help you if you’re not able to see the parent post which is quote in the article

I don’t know how to help you if can’t see that’s nowhere to be found.

It has this important line which we’re discussing in this thread.

That word is not there either.

The word it does have is “could”, meaning does not currently.

it should be easy for you to cite a company that got Fedramp work without being Fedramp certified

Once again, no one is talking about " fedramp" but the entire article goes into detail about the subject of government requirements for contractors that don’t exist. Maybe give it a look.

source

Sort:hotnew top

partial_accumen@lemmy.world ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

Once again, no one is talking about " fedramp" but the entire article goes into detail about the subject of government requirements for contractors that don’t exist. Maybe give it a look.

I’m talking about Fedramp as an example of a government compliance regime that “through government procurement laws, governments” DOES "require any company providing a product or service to the government to not interfere with interoperability.”

I’m confused how you’re spending so much effort in a conversation and you’re not able to connect basic concepts.

Article premise: “Wouldn’t it be great if X exists?”

Me: “X does exist for a specific area, its called Fedramp.”

Where is the difficulty you are encountering in understanding conversational flow?

source
- helenslunch@feddit.nl ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
  
  Me: “X does exist for a specific area, its called Fedramp.”
  
  What you’re talking about, and what myself and the author are talking about, are clearly not the same thing.
  
  Where is the difficulty you are encountering in understanding conversational flow?
  
  source
  - partial_accumen@lemmy.world ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    
    What you’re talking about, and what myself and the author are talking about, are clearly not the same thing.
    
    Unless you’re Doctorow, I don’t think you can speak for the author, but you can certainly for yourself.
    
    I looked at your post history and I don’t see anything I’d consider trolling, but your responses her are screaming that in this thread of conversation. I’m just going to chalk this up to us SERIOUSLY not communicating with one another for some unknown reason.
    
    There’s no point in us conversing further on this. I’m making clear my point in multiple ways. You’re still not getting it so lets just end this here.
    
    I hope your other conversation with others are more communicative that this one. Have a great day!
    
    source
    helenslunch@feddit.nl ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago
    
    I’m making clear my point in multiple ways. You’re still not getting it so lets just end this here.
    
    Back at ya
    
    source