Comment on US couple blocked from suing Uber after crash say daughter agreed to Uber Eats terms

• PriorityMotif@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Show me the lease agreement that says I’m wrong. I guarantee it’s much different than a standard commercial lease with more stringent requirements. If Disney is making specific requirements then they have a duty to enforce them.

  source

  • ZMonster@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I appreciate your concerns, but truly: I owe you nothing. It takes very little integrity to make an uninformed allegation and then sit back with a smug look and a mug full of selfrighteousness decrying “prove me wrong”.

    Why don’t you prove Legal Eagle wrong? It would without a doubt be more fruitful because I’m not entertaining it.

    source

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      Then why did they attempt to invoke the terms of an unrelated service rather than having the case dismissed outright? Makes no sense.

      source

      • ZMonster@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Obviously I can’t possibly speak as to why they chose to do what they did. But I would assume that making a motion to dismiss due to the fact that arbitration has already been agreed to (seemingly unrelated from your perspective but from a legal perspective is really the only substantive aspect, so wildly related) is far less scandalous than making a motion to dismiss with no recourse for the plaintiff at all and would be far more damaging to their reputation.

        And that DOES make sense.

        source

        • -> View More Comments